What Our Clients Say - Testimonials

Money Laundering Charges

Both Texas a penal code and the federal criminal code have detailed statutes outlining what constitutes the crime of money laundering. Although the crime can be prosecuted locally, when the amounts in question reach tens of thousands of dollars, the federal government usually gets involved. The federal money laundering statute can be found at 18 U.S.C. 1956 and is housed under the RICO statute:

(a)

    (1) Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity—

      (A)

        (i) with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity; or

        (ii) with intent to engage in conduct constituting a violation of section 7201 or 7206 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or

      (B) knowing that the transaction is designed in whole or in part—

        (i) to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity; or

        (ii) to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law, shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both. For purposes of this paragraph, a financial transaction shall be considered to be one involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity if it is part of a set of parallel or dependent transactions, any one of which involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, and all of which are part of a single plan or arrangement.

    (2) Whoever transports, transmits, or transfers, or attempts to transport, transmit, or transfer a monetary instrument or funds from a place in the United States to or through a place outside the United States or to a place in the United States from or through a place outside the United States—

      (A) with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity; or

      (B) knowing that the monetary instrument or funds involved in the transportation, transmission, or transfer represent the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity and knowing that such transportation, transmission, or transfer is designed in whole or in part—

        (i) to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity; or

        (ii) to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law, shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the monetary instrument or funds involved in the transportation, transmission, or transfer, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both. For the purpose of the offense described in subparagraph (B), the defendant’s knowledge may be established by proof that a law enforcement officer represented the matter specified in subparagraph (B) as true, and the defendant’s subsequent statements or actions indicate that the defendant believed such representations to be true.

      (3) Whoever, with the intent—

        (A) to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity;

        (B) to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of property believed to be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity; or

        (C) to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law, conducts or attempts to conduct a financial transaction involving property represented to be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, or property used to conduct or facilitate specified unlawful activity, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both. For purposes of this paragraph and paragraph (2), the term “represented” means any representation made by a law enforcement officer or by another person at the direction of, or with the approval of, a Federal official authorized to investigate or prosecute violations of this section.

    (b) Penalties.—

      (1) In general.— Whoever conducts or attempts to conduct a transaction described in subsection (a)(1) or (a)(3), or section 1957, or a transportation, transmission, or transfer described in subsection (a)(2), is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than the greater of—

        (A) the value of the property, funds, or monetary instruments involved in the transaction; or

        (B) $10,000.

      (2) Jurisdiction over foreign persons.— For purposes of adjudicating an action filed or enforcing a penalty ordered under this section, the district courts shall have jurisdiction over any foreign person, including any financial institution authorized under the laws of a foreign country, against whom the action is brought, if service of process upon the foreign person is made under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the laws of the country in which the foreign person is found, and—

        (A) the foreign person commits an offense under subsection (a) involving a financial transaction that occurs in whole or in part in the United States;

        (B) the foreign person converts, to his or her own use, property in which the United States has an ownership interest by virtue of the entry of an order of forfeiture by a court of the United States; or

        (C) the foreign person is a financial institution that maintains a bank account at a financial institution in the United States.

      (3) Court authority over assets.— A court may issue a pretrial restraining order or take any other action necessary to ensure that any bank account or other property held by the defendant in the United States is available to satisfy a judgment under this section.
      ...

      (d) Nothing in this section shall supersede any provision of Federal, State, or other law imposing criminal penalties or affording civil remedies in addition to those provided for in this section.
      ...

      (f) There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section if—

        (1) the conduct is by a United States citizen or, in the case of a non-United States citizen, the conduct occurs in part in the United States; and

        (2) the transaction or series of related transactions involves funds or monetary instruments of a value exceeding $10,000.

The state statute governing money laundering is much broader. Pursuant to the Money Laundering statute set forth in Section 34.02 of the Texas Penal Code:

(a)  A person commits an offense if the person knowingly:

    (1)  acquires or maintains an interest in, conceals, possesses, transfers, or transports the proceeds of criminal activity;

    (2)  conducts, supervises, or facilitates a transaction involving the proceeds of criminal activity;

    (3)  invests, expends, or receives, or offers to invest, expend, or receive, the proceeds of criminal activity or funds that the person believes are the proceeds of criminal activity; or

    (4)  finances or invests or intends to finance or invest funds that the person believes are intended to further the commission of criminal activity.

(a-1)  Knowledge of the specific nature of the criminal activity giving rise to the proceeds is not required to establish a culpable mental state under this section.

(b)  For purposes of this section, a person is presumed to believe that funds are the proceeds of or are intended to further the commission of criminal activity if a peace officer or a person acting at the direction of a peace officer represents to the person that the funds are proceeds of or are intended to further the commission of criminal activity, as applicable, regardless of whether the peace officer or person acting at the peace officer's direction discloses the person's status as a peace officer or that the person is acting at the direction of a peace officer.

(c)  It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the person acted with intent to facilitate the lawful seizure, forfeiture, or disposition of funds or other legitimate law enforcement purpose pursuant to the laws of this state or the United States.

(d)  It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the transaction was necessary to preserve a person's right to representation as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and by Article 1, Section 10, of the Texas Constitution or that the funds were received as bona fide legal fees by a licensed attorney and at the time of their receipt, the attorney did not have actual knowledge that the funds were derived from criminal activity.

Practice Areas   Services Menu   Need Assistance?
  Federal Charges
Homicide
Felonies
White Collar Crimes
Sex Offenses
Child Pornography
DWI/DUI
Drug Charges
Assault
Gun Crimes
Juvenile Crimes Public Officials
MIP/MIC
Theft
Disorderly Conduct
Mental Health
Addiction
Obstruction of
Justice
Defense of Criminal Charges
Business Protection
Grand Jury
Administrative Law
Professional Discipline
School Discipline
Appeals
Writs
Probation Revocation
Probation Termination
Expunctions
Sealing Records
Non-Disclosures
Protective Orders
Occupational Licenses
Counseling
Jail Release
Open Door Initiative
Contact Us
Press Room
Our Firm
Emergency


© 2008 Sumpter & Gonzalez , L.L.P., 206 East 9th Street, Suite 1511, Austin, TX 78701 - T: 512- 381-9955 | F: 512-485-3121